If you still are in question at the authenticity of the Jordan Lead Codices check out my friend Dan McClellan’s blog here. With the aid of other bibliobloggers, he helps expose much of the Elkington’s (those behind the “find”) fervent efforts to suppress the mounting evidence against the authenticity of the codices. It has been demonstrated by metallurgists that “… this is not characteristic of lead that has been buried”, referring to the fact that, and I quote the original transcript, “… it would be expected that the surface crust would be thicker and that there would be greater penetration of the metal leaving, at least, a pitted surface.” This transcript had been tampered with by the Elkingtons, removing this statement. It is time for them to be ignored and for any remaining hype to go away.
